fbpx

Ninth Amendment Rights

Historical Background of the Ninth Amendment

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 saw heated debates over the need for a Bill of Rights. Federalists argued that enumerating rights was unnecessary and risky, while Anti-Federalists demanded explicit protections against government overreach.

James Madison proposed a compromise that became the precursor to the Ninth Amendment. He envisioned a clause that would safeguard rights without limiting them to those explicitly mentioned.

At the state ratifying conventions, states submitted hundreds of proposed amendments, many focusing on personal liberties. Roger Sherman of Connecticut proposed that the amendments be appended to the Constitution rather than integrated within.

The Ninth Amendment emerged as a safety net, making it clear that just because a right was not specifically listed did not mean it could be disparaged or denied.

For a long time, courts treated the Ninth Amendment with caution. In Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), it got some attention when Justice Douglas's majority opinion referenced it while cobbling together a right to privacy from various amendments.

Heated debate at the Constitutional Convention of 1787

Text and Interpretation of the Ninth Amendment

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

This brief sentence has sparked many debates. It's saying that listing some rights doesn't mean there aren't other rights that still belong to the people. It's a rule of construction, designed to keep the government from claiming more power simply because a right wasn't written down.

Differing Interpretations:

  • Conservative view: The Ninth Amendment is a reminder, not a source of new rights.
  • Originalist view: It's a rule of caution, keeping wayward interpretations in check.
  • Liberal view: It's a gateway to expansive, unenumerated rights.

In Griswold v. Connecticut, Justice Douglas invoked it to bolster the penumbrasโ€”zones where constitutional guarantees overlap and protect additional rights, such as privacy.

Justice Scalia threw water on the Ninth as a source of judicially enforceable rights. He cautioned against turning judges into lawmakers, which he viewed as overreach.

The Ninth Amendment serves as a constitutional Rorschach test. Conservatives see it as a rule of construction, while liberals see it as a clue that there's more to rights than explicitly listed ones.

The Ninth Amendment in Supreme Court Decisions

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965): The Court faced a Connecticut law banning contraceptives, even for married couples. Justice Douglas's majority opinion conjured up "penumbras" and "emanations" from the Bill of Rights to argue for a general right to privacy. The Ninth Amendment got a nod, with Justice Goldberg leaning on it more heavily in his concurring opinion.

Roe v. Wade (1973): The majority opinion relied on the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, framing abortion as part of a woman's right to privacy. The Ninth Amendment's spirit was present, but not directly cited.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022): This case overturned Roe. Justice Alito's opinion showed little respect for the Ninth Amendment. He grounded his opinion in the text of the Constitution, dismissing more abstract interpretations.

These cases highlight how the Ninth remains enigmatic, occasionally appearing in decisions but never seizing the spotlight. It signals that while enumerated rights are ironclad, unenumerated ones exist but without the same level of judicial enforcement.

The future of the Ninth Amendment remains uncertain. Conservatives argue for keeping it as a mere rule of construction, while liberals see it as evidence that the Constitution can evolve to protect essential freedoms not originally listed.

Exterior of the Supreme Court building with its iconic columns

Scholarly Perspectives on the Ninth Amendment

Randy Barnett sees the Ninth Amendment as recognizing natural rights existing independently of government acknowledgment. He suggests a model where the Ninth Amendment mandates a "presumption of liberty," requiring the government to justify laws that might infringe on natural rights.

Akhil Amar interprets the Ninth as a safeguard for collective rights, emphasizing the people's overall sovereignty. He argues it secures the collective power to alter or abolish government, harkening back to Revolutionary ethos.

Louis Michael Seidman contends that the Ninth Amendment reminds us of unlisted rights without specifying what they are. For him, it keeps the debate on unenumerated rights ongoing, ideally through contemporary democratic processes.

Russell Caplan's state law rights model interprets "retained" rights as those granted by state laws but potentially preempted by federal laws. Thomas McAffee's residual rights model posits that the Ninth protects rights not surrendered to the federal government.

Justice Antonin Scalia viewed the Ninth as a cautionary note but not a source of enforceable rights. He opposed the idea of judges identifying and enforcing unenumerated rights.

These perspectives offer a spectrum of interpretations, from libertarian to historical collectivism to pragmatic realism, keeping the Ninth Amendment in ongoing debate.

Diverse group of legal scholars engaged in a debate about the Ninth Amendment

The Ninth Amendment and Modern Legal Debates

After Roe v. Wade was overturned by the Dobbs decision in 2022, the Ninth Amendment's potential role in underpinning the unenumerated right to privacy gained attention. It could become relevant in challenging overly restrictive state abortion laws.1

In Griswold v. Connecticut, Justice Hugo Black referenced the Ninth to support privacy rights in family planning and contraceptive use. This precedent influences modern debates on:

  • Digital privacy
  • Surveillance
  • Bodily autonomy

Family rights remain another area where the Ninth Amendment is relevant. It could play a role in debates over:

  1. Lifestyle choices
  2. Parental rights
  3. Reproductive technologies like IVF

Alabama's recent decision to classify embryos as "children" eligible for wrongful death claims might be contested using Ninth Amendment arguments.2

The Ninth may become significant in future cases involving:

  • Same-sex adoption
  • Right-to-die debates
  • Parental rights in homeschooling or medical decisions

Even critics of substantive due process, like Justice Clarence Thomas, haven't completely dismissed the Ninth Amendment's potential impact.

"Whether protecting privacy, shaping family rights, or influencing the abortion debate, the Ninth Amendment remains a player in ongoing American jurisprudence."
Modern courtroom during a constitutional rights case

The Ninth Amendment stands as a testament to the foresight of the Founding Fathers, reminding us that not all rights need to be explicitly listed to be protected. Its role in safeguarding unenumerated rights continues to provoke thought and debate, ensuring that our liberties remain strong against governmental overreach.